Electronic Engineer Discuss

Author: gf1
Print Prev. thread Next thread

6074BD - offset errors

[Copy link]

10

Threads

171

Posts

171

Credits

注册会员

Rank: 2

Credits
171
12#
Post time 2019-4-9 08:21:44 | Show the author posts only
Ok, so after many tests (I won't describe all them, it is not important) I am 100% sure that the offset problem is cause by a bug in the PC software and I found a temporary fix for it, at least until Hantek release an update.

The bug affects the version 2.2.4 of the software available for download on the product's web page. To fix the offset, install an older version (I've used Ver. 2.1.36, included in the CD) and run the calibration routine, done.

Result of the calibration using Ver. 2.2.4 of the software:



The same scope after re-running calibration using Ver. 2.1.36:


I want a beer



This post contains more resources

You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register

x

10

Threads

171

Posts

171

Credits

注册会员

Rank: 2

Credits
171
11#
Post time 2019-4-6 07:34:27 | Show the author posts only
Dear Amy,

Please let me know when you have the software update ready with the fix, I'm needing that.

thx

167

Threads

2069

Posts

2230

Credits

版主

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

Credits
2230
10#
Post time 2019-3-27 10:55:50 | Show the author posts only
Sir, yes, we found that there was a bug with the software. Oue engineer planned to finish the modification by the end of this week.
Please wait a while.

10

Threads

171

Posts

171

Credits

注册会员

Rank: 2

Credits
171
9#
Post time 2019-3-26 14:36:53 | Show the author posts only
I've being doing some more tests with a 6074BE and I think I may have found the problem, well at least one of them...

I am almost convinced that the main cause of this offset error is a software problem. I noticed that the initial position of the channel's cursor (the arrow on the left) on the screen influences the results of the calibration. Setting the cursors at the center of the screen before start the calibration yields the best results for me. I also noticed that changing the time/div to below 1us increases the offset. Changing the power supplied to the scope also has influence, so the thing is not so simple...

I am planing to do a more systematic test later and I'll report back with more details.


4

Threads

29

Posts

29

Credits

新手上路

Rank: 1

Credits
29
8#
 Author| Post time 2019-3-26 01:47:56 | Show the author posts only
OASJ2YSeeEhBQo1 replied at 2019-3-24 12:15
I got in contact with Hantek by e-mail and they replied with one possible solution.

Try this: conne ...

Thank you, I will try...


10

Threads

171

Posts

171

Credits

注册会员

Rank: 2

Credits
171
7#
Post time 2019-3-24 12:15:37 | Show the author posts only
Edited by OASJ2YSeeEhBQo1 at 2019-3-24 22:55

I got in contact with Hantek by e-mail and they replied with one possible solution.

Try this: connect the black connector of the USB cable to your computer and the red one connect to an external power supply (like an USB charger) but it must be a good one, capable of supply 5V@2A then try the calibration again. For my case it helped and I can see an improvement although some offset still visible in the lower volt/div settings.

Apparently the problem is related to insufficient power being supplied to the device.


4

Threads

29

Posts

29

Credits

新手上路

Rank: 1

Credits
29
6#
 Author| Post time 2019-3-13 07:25:27 | Show the author posts only
Edited by gf1 at 2019-3-14 03:04

When I look at the PCB photos available in the internet, then V/div attenuators, ADC driver, channel multiplexer look quite different in the 2000 and 6000BD series. One common sub-circuit is obviously the dual-path input buffer amplifier, which uses a discrete FET source follower on the fast AC path, and an AD9510 on the DC path. This sub-circuit seems to be present - with small variations - in several scopes (IIRC also in some Rigol ones).

gf1


10

Threads

171

Posts

171

Credits

注册会员

Rank: 2

Credits
171
5#
Post time 2019-3-12 12:39:18 | Show the author posts only
Does the 6074 scopes and the new Hantek2000 share a similar frontend or piece of firmware? I'm asking because I am observing a similar problem with my 2D42 and as gf1 noticed, I can clearly see the offset of trace or waveform changing as I change the scale setting or turn on/off a channel. Calibrating didn't help as well.

I will try to make a quick video later to better illustrate the issue.

4

Threads

29

Posts

29

Credits

新手上路

Rank: 1

Credits
29
4#
 Author| Post time 2019-3-12 03:19:14 | Show the author posts only
Edited by gf1 at 2019-3-12 03:21

I do not see a statistically significant difference with open inputs and 50 Ohm terminated inputs. The resulting offsets vary anyway when I run the calibration multiple times in sequence. And after a calibration run, the residual offset is not invariant either, for each channel, but varies with the set of enabled channels, V/div, time/div and bandwidth limit setting.


[ It were certainly not the best idea, though, to keep the probe connected and to short the ground lead to the probe tip, since this "loop antenna" may pickup noise from the environment. ]

gf1




1

Threads

38

Posts

38

Credits

新手上路

Rank: 1

Credits
38
3#
Post time 2019-3-11 08:45:07 | Show the author posts only
Hantek will reply in 24 hours
You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Dark room|Mobile|Archiver|Electronic Engineer Discuss

2024-5-20 12:12 GMT+8 , Processed in 0.173376 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list