|
Edited by Oleg10011001 at 2017-3-7 10:31
Rule of thumb: get a scope that has a bandwidth of at least the 9th harmonic. So if you're going for square waves, it's better to get a scope with a bandwidth of at least 10x the frequency of your square wave.
Is this enough? Firstly, I heard that for normal reconstruction of the shape of a rectangular signal, one must have at least 10th harmonics of this signal, and better - 13th. Secondly, these harmonics will also be measured by the oscilloscope and, accordingly, the frequency of the last harmonic we need (9th or 10th or 13th) must not exceed 1/3 of the bandwidth of the oscilloscope, so that the measurement error does not exceed 5% or 1/5 of the passband if the measurement error is not more than 3%. Thus, it turns out that the maximum frequency of a rectangular signal with which the oscilloscope can work normally is much less than the bandwidth specified by you of 1/10. In addition, I think that to restore the waveform is important not so much the bandwidth as the sampling rate ... How much minimum is required samples for the period of the rectangular signal for the normal recovery of its shape, so that for example it was possible to measure its fronts? As a result, it turns out that an oscilloscope with a bandwidth of 200 Mhz at a sampling rate of 1GS / sec will be able to operate normally with a square signal having a frequency of no more than 2-4Mhz (If the measurement error is not more than 3%), and not 20Mhz (1/10 of 200Mhz) ... Am I wrong?
P.S: Sorry my bad english.
|
|