I guess this bug is the same that was reported in this thread:
https://www.eediscuss.com/forum. ... &extra=page%3D1
It remained unanswered.
The csv reported by Aletek was like this:
Time ,CH1 [V]
2.000000e-06,-0.080000000000,
2.000000e-06,-1.520000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.200000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.680000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.840000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.840000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.920000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.840000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.760000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.760000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.680000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.680000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.680000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.680000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.680000000000,
2.000000e-06,-3.520000000000,
...
I guess the incremental for time could be calculated by accumulating the timebase in the first column in a spreadsheet, like this:
Time CH1 [V] Time (acum)
2,00E+00 -0.080000000000 2,00E+00
2,00E+00 -1.520.000.000.000 4,00E+00
2,00E+00 -3.200.000.000.000 6,00E+00
2,00E+00 -3.680.000.000.000 8,00E+00
2,00E+00 -3.840.000.000.000 1,00E+01
2,00E+00 -3.840.000.000.000 1,20E+01
2,00E+00 -3.920.000.000.000 1,40E+01
2,00E+00 -3.840.000.000.000 1,60E+01
2,00E+00 -3.760.000.000.000 1,80E+01
2,00E+00 -3.760.000.000.000 2,00E+01
2,00E+00 -3.680.000.000.000 2,20E+01
...
Of course, it'd be better if the scope exported the csv with this information, but maybe this workaround could be enough
|